Skip to main content

Korea vs FDA · TGA · CE · PMDA · HSA

High-level comparison

FeatureKorea (MFDS)USA (FDA)Australia (TGA)EU (MDR/IVDR)Japan (PMDA)Singapore (HSA)
Classification gradesI, II, III, IVClass I, II, IIIClass I, IIa, IIb, IIIClass I, IIa, IIb, IIIClass I–IVClass A–D
Pre-market reviewGrade III/IV: MFDS review510(k), PMAARTG inclusionCE marking (Notified Body)Approval by PMDAProduct Registration
GMPKGMP (MFDS-issued cert)QSR (FDA inspection)GMP (TGA or ISO 13485)Annex I (ISO 13485)JGMP (PMDA inspection)ISO 13485
Notified Body / CBNo (MFDS direct review)No (FDA direct)No (TGA direct)YES — Notified BodyNo (PMDA direct)No (HSA direct)
UDIUDI-K (KIMS)GUDID (FDA UDI)ARTG UDIEUDAMED UDIUDI-DI/PISDUDI
Re-examinationYES — unique to KoreaNo equivalentNo equivalentNo equivalentYES — similar systemNo equivalent
Separate IVD ActYES — separate IVD ActNo (single FDA act)NoYES — separate IVDRNoNo

Key unique features of Korean regulation

  • Separate IVD Act — IVD devices regulated under a dedicated statute
  • Re-examination (재심사) — unique mandatory post-market review for new approvals
  • KGMP as prerequisite — GMP certification must be obtained before 품목허가
  • AI/ML guidance — Korea was among the first to issue dedicated AI/ML medical device guidance