Class C — Full Registration
Overview
Class C requires an enhanced registration dossier with substantive clinical evidence in addition to all Class B requirements. A third-party Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) review of technical documentation is required. Target processing time is 120 working days.
Additional Requirements vs Class B
Full Clinical Evaluation Report (CER)
The CER must comply with GHTF SG5 / IMDRF MDCE WG guidance and include:
- Systematic literature search and appraisal
- Clinical data from relevant clinical investigations
- Demonstration of clinical benefit
- Acceptable benefit-risk analysis
- Equivalence justification (if applicable, with full equivalence documentation)
Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up (PMCF) Plan
- Plan for collecting ongoing clinical data after registration
- Frequency and methodology of PMCF activities
- Integration with the overall PMS plan
Conformity Assessment Body (CAB) Review
For Class C devices, the technical documentation must be reviewed by a MDA-recognised CAB before submission:
- CAB issues a Technical Documentation Assessment Report
- This report is submitted as part of the registration dossier
- CAB review is separate from QMS certification (ISO 13485)
Recognised CABs include international notified bodies and testing organisations recognised by MDA. Check the current MDA-recognised CAB list on the MDA website.
Enhanced Risk Management File
- Full risk management file (not summary) — ISO 14971 compliant
- Risk management report
- Post-production information procedures
Full Dossier Structure
Class C includes all Class B sections plus:
| Additional Section | Content |
|---|---|
| Full Clinical Evaluation Report | Per GHTF SG5 / IMDRF MDCE WG |
| PMCF Plan | Per IMDRF MDCE WG/N56 |
| CAB Technical Documentation Assessment | From MDA-recognised CAB |
| Full Risk Management File | ISO 14971 compliant file |
| Biological Safety Evaluation | Full ISO 10993 reports (not just summary) |
Practical Considerations
CAB review can take 3–6 months for complex Class C devices. Engage your CAB early in the preparation process — ideally before your full dossier is assembled. Incorporate CAB feedback before submission to MDA.
If relying on equivalence to an already-marketed device, MDA requires demonstration of:
- Clinical equivalence (same intended use and clinical conditions)
- Technical equivalence (similar design, dimensions, materials)
- Biological equivalence (same materials in contact with body) Full access to the equivalent device's technical documentation is typically required.