How SFDA Classification Works
Overviewโ
The SFDA classifies medical devices using a risk-based system that is closely aligned with the EU Medical Device Regulation (EU MDR 2017/745). The classification rules are set out in MDS-REQ 1 and interpreted through the guidance document MDS-G008.
Classification is the manufacturer's responsibility. The correct risk class determines:
- The depth of technical documentation required
- QMS certification requirements
- The SFDA's review approach and depth
- Applicable post-market obligations (PMS Report vs PSUR frequency)
- Application fees
The four risk classesโ
| Class | Risk level | Typical examples |
|---|---|---|
| Class A | Low risk | Non-sterile bandages, tongue depressors, non-measuring examination gloves |
| Class B | Low-to-moderate risk | Sterile devices (Class As), measuring devices (Class Am), reusable surgical instruments (Class Ar), hypodermic needles |
| Class C | Moderate-to-high risk | Haemodialysis equipment, ventilators, surgical lasers, bone fixation plates |
| Class D | High risk | Active implantable cardiac devices, heart valves, spinal implants, HIV diagnostic tests |
Class A devices have three important sub-categories that carry higher documentation requirements:
- Class As โ Class A devices supplied in a sterile condition
- Class Am โ Class A devices with a measuring function
- Class Ar โ Class A devices that are reusable surgical instruments
These sub-types require Annex II/III equivalent conformity assessment and more detailed technical files despite remaining Class A overall.
Classification rules โ aligned with EU MDRโ
The SFDA's classification rules in MDS-REQ 1 are identical to the 22 classification rules of EU MDR Annex VIII. Manufacturers who have already classified their device under EU MDR can apply that classification directly to the SFDA system, using the EU-to-SFDA class mapping:
| EU MDR Class | SFDA Class |
|---|---|
| Class I | Class A |
| Class IIa | Class B |
| Class IIb | Class C |
| Class III | Class D |
This does not mean a CE certificate substitutes for SFDA MDMA โ but it greatly simplifies the classification step.
Step-by-step classification processโ
- Confirm the intended purpose of the device as stated by the manufacturer
- Determine the device type โ general medical device, active device, implantable device, or IVD
- Apply the classification rules in MDS-REQ 1 using the correct rule set for the device type
- Apply the highest applicable class where multiple rules apply
- Document the classification justification in the technical file, referencing the specific rule(s) applied
- Consider any SFDA borderline guidance in MDS-G008 if the device is novel or atypical
IVD classificationโ
IVD devices have a separate classification system. See IVD Classification for details.
Software classificationโ
Software that qualifies as a medical device (SaMD) is classified using the applicable rules in MDS-REQ 1, informed by IMDRF SaMD principles. See Software & SaMD Classification.
Borderline productsโ
If it is unclear whether a product is a medical device, or which class applies, see Borderline & Combination Products and consult MDS-G008.
Further readingโ
- MDS-REQ 1 โ Classification rules (Part 2)
- MDS-G008 โ Classification guidance document
- Class A ยท Class B ยท Class C ยท Class D
- IVD Classification