Skip to main content

Predicate Device Selection

Selecting the right predicate is one of the most consequential decisions in preparing a 510(k). A weak or inappropriate predicate can result in an NSE decision or a high volume of additional information requests.


What qualifies as a predicate?โ€‹

A valid predicate device is a device that was:

  1. Legally marketed before May 28, 1976 (the enactment date of the Medical Device Amendments), and has not been reclassified โ€” known as a "preamendments device"; OR
  2. Cleared through the 510(k) process after May 28, 1976; OR
  3. Classified through a De Novo order (which creates a new legally marketed reference)
caution

A device approved via PMA cannot serve as a predicate for a 510(k).


Finding a predicateโ€‹

  1. 510(k) Database (accessdata.fda.gov) โ€” search cleared devices by product code, device name, or applicant name
  2. FDA Product Classification Database โ€” links cleared devices to their product code
  3. 510(k) Summary documents โ€” publicly available summaries describe the predicate used and SE rationale

Predicate selection strategyโ€‹

A good predicate:

  • Has the same intended use as your device
  • Has closely similar technological characteristics
  • Is recently cleared (recent predicates reflect current regulatory standards)
  • Has a publicly available 510(k) summary allowing you to verify the basis of SE

Multiple predicatesโ€‹

FDA permits the use of multiple predicates in a single 510(k):

  • Use Predicate A for intended use comparison
  • Use Predicate B for a specific technological characteristic

This is called a "split predicate" approach. FDA has accepted this strategy, though it requires clear and explicit justification in the submission.


The predicate chainโ€‹

A cleared 510(k) can itself serve as a predicate for a future 510(k), creating a predicate chain. While legal, long predicate chains can create problems:

  • Older predicates may no longer reflect current state of the art
  • FDA may raise concerns if a predicate chain leads back to a device with known safety issues

When no predicate existsโ€‹

If no suitable predicate exists, consider:

  • De Novo classification request โ€” for novel, low-to-moderate risk devices
  • Expanding the predicate search to a higher-level device type (general intended use)
  • A Q-submission (pre-sub) to discuss predicate strategy with FDA before submitting

Official resourcesโ€‹