Skip to main content

Performance Evaluation (IVD)

Overview​

For in vitro diagnostic devices under IVDO, clinical evidence takes the form of a performance evaluation rather than a clinical evaluation. The performance evaluation is required by IVDO Annex XIII and must demonstrate that the device achieves its claimed analytical and clinical performance.

Types of Performance Data​

Analytical performance — measures the IVD's technical ability to measure or detect an analyte:

  • Accuracy (trueness and precision)
  • Analytical sensitivity (limit of detection, limit of quantification)
  • Analytical specificity (cross-reactivity, interference)
  • Linearity / measuring range
  • Cut-off determination

Clinical performance — measures the IVD's ability to produce outcomes that correlate with the clinical condition:

  • Diagnostic sensitivity (true positive rate)
  • Diagnostic specificity (true negative rate)
  • Positive/negative predictive values

Performance Studies​

For List A and List B IVDs, performance studies may require involvement of a notified body or ethics committee review. Key types:

  • Analytical performance studies — laboratory studies validating analytical claims
  • Clinical performance studies — studies involving human specimens or participants to validate clinical performance claims
  • Scientific validity assessment — establishing the analyte's association with the clinical condition

MDCG 2022-2 Guidance​

MDCG 2022-2 (Guidance on general principles of clinical evidence for IVDs) is applicable in Switzerland and provides detailed guidance on the performance evaluation process, performance study design, and how to demonstrate compliance with IVDO Annex XIII.

Official Sources​

Disclaimer

AI-assisted content for navigation only. Always verify against official Swissmedic and Fedlex sources. Not legal or regulatory advice.